Inspiration for all

 

Chris Goodall "How to Live a Low Carbon Life"

Chris Goodall "How to Live a Low-Carbon Life"


 

Richard Heinberg "The Party's Over"

Richard Heinberg "The Party's Over"


 

George Monbiot "Heat"

George Monbiot "Heat"


 

DVD - "The Power of Community"

The Power of Community - How Cuba Survived Peak Oil - DVD


 

DVD - "The End of Suburbia"

The End of Suburbia - Oil Depletion & the Collapse of the American Dream - DVD

Home
1. Organise
2. Powerdown
3. Recycle
4. Substitute
5. Stay
6. Generate
7. Grow
8. Invest
9. Make
10. Community
Peak Oil
Climate Change
About Us
Post-Carbon Homes
Post-Carbon Blog
Contact


Photovoltaics
Windpower
CHP Heat/Power



 

From the Library Shelf:

Authors A thru D
Authors E thru H
Authors I thru L
Authors M thru Q
Authors R thru U
Authors V thru Z
Kids' Books

 

Proud Co-Founders of Transition Town High Wycombe

 

Organise | Powerdown | Recycle | Substitute | Stay | Generate | Grow | Invest | Make | Community

Electricity from the Sun

Photovoltaics in High Wycombe

Photovoltaic panels can be anything up to 19% efficient at converting sunshine into electricity. That may not sound a lot but consider this: a tree is only 5% efficient at capturing the sun's energy and converting it into biomass. One sq meter of Solar Cells replaces 250 hectares of Biofuel Plantation. For once human technology trumps nature in producing a device that is almost four times better than nature's photosynthesis. But there is a problem, the cost per tonne of carbon saved is 30 to 100 times that of, say, a wind turbine. Photovoltaics are expensive true - but they have certain advantages... You can bolt Photovoltaics to any south-facing roof in the northern hemisphere and it will generate lots of electricity. It has no moving parts and is unobtrusive. Once installed you forget it is there. In short - Photovoltaics are one of the most practical types of microgeneration around. We believe everyone should have these installed and now the Feed-in Tariff makes them highly profitable. Read on...

The waxing & waning fortunes of UK PV as microgeneration- 2005 to today

For a while the photovoltaic panel - electricity from the sun - was quite an attractive cause for politicians. In the UK the EST would give out grants usually for half the cost of an installation. A good 1.5kWph installation might cost around £9000 to install but the British Government then gave you £4500 back in grant money - usually paid straight to the installer who filled the forms in for you.

 

However, in 2007 the sun temporarily set on the industry as the Government cooled its enthusiasm. Grants under the Low Carbon Building program were capped at £2500 per household - and that is IF you can get them. The scheme had already suffered long delays in getting its monthly funding from Government coffers leading to long waits for many applicants. Why the change? No, it has nothing to with the lack of Sun - in fact we have loads of Sun - more than enough to make Photovoltaics work very nicely! (Potentially 30 TWh annually alone in the UK.) No, but it is an absurdly expensive way to save carbon. It is bottom of the list after bio-mass, wind-turbines, nuclear, carbon capture on coal power stations, and so on.

 

However, conventional economics tend to tell only half the story. Indeed, Photovoltaics seem very expensive in comparison to Fossil Fuels. However, Oil prices do not include the cost of replacement technology nor the potential cost of disposing of its waste products. Unlike all the alternatives Photovoltaics has one massive advantage. Whereas few of us will ever own a wind-turbine or be able to grow energy crops, practically EVERYONE can participate in Solar Power. Expensive as they may be, you can bolt those solar panels to any building and their capital cost is far lower than the smallest Nuclear or Coal Power station.

 

Unlike Wind or Wave Power you can cover a modern building with photovoltaic panels and it will be cheaper than other expensive prestige coverings. The Industry just needed to achieve market penetration. Mass production was needed to decrease the cost. Photovoltaic panels needed to be produced in every shape and size. They needed to be direct substitutes for normal building coverings. Such devices already existed - the "Solar Tile" had been on the market for several years but suffered from being 1.8 times the cost and 5% LESS efficient than regular 'bolt-on' systems. Semi integrated systems were a good compromise at 1.3 times the cost. Hybrid systems are now available that combine Solar Electric with Solar Thermal - electricity and hot water (picture below)! So there were plenty of good ideas and new options appearing all the time. It is also believed that, with the march of technology, the cost of photovoltaic cells could rapidly fall. We hoped so.

 

Take one case study: When combined with Energy Saving Light bulbs a three bedroom house in the south of England went from consuming over 4400 Units of electricity per year in 2004 down to just 2500 (a drop of 42%) after installation of 1.5kWph unit in 2005. This household was earning over £70 a year from its exported electricity. This was enough money to pay for another three months worth of electricity. In essence this house got 7 months worth of free electricity every year. The per person annual Carbon footprint of this house's occupants dropped to 2.2 tonnes whereas the UK average was 5.4 tonnes.

Hybrid Photovoltaic & Solar Thermal

However, even in 2005, you would never make your money back but it still made a big difference. If every householder did it (or the panels were simply built into every new home) then they would quickly contribute 10% of our Power needs within the United Kingdom. This is a very conservative estimate. You could actually produce over 200 terra-watt hours (TWh) per year just from the sunlight falling on rooftops in the UK. The UK only needs 400 TWh per year! That is 50% just from rooftops. That doesn't account for anything like the total available landmass. So much solar radiation reaches the ground that all of our energy needs could be met many thousand times over with a simple piece of technology with no moving parts. How wonderful is that?

 

Very wonderful in fact. So wonderful that by 2008 the Climate Change Bill was passed in Parliament. With it came a new Energy Act that introduced the Feed-in Tariff. The so called "clean energy cashback". The Feed-in Tariff is modeled upon a scheme operating successfully in Germany for many years. Its intention is to boost the use of domestic renewable energy, hence it will boost the sector, 'kick-start' the industry in the UK and create green jobs.

 

Feed In Tariff table - High WycombeFrom 1st April 2010 householders and communities who install low carbon electricity technology such as solar photovoltaic (pv) panels and wind turbines up to 5 megawatts will be paid for the electricity they generate, even if they use it themselves. The level of payment depends on the technology and is linked to inflation. It is tax free too. They will get a further payment for any electricity they feed into the grid. These payments will be in addition to benefiting from reduced bills as they reduce the need to buy electricity.

 

The scheme will also apply to installations commissioned since July 2008 when the policy was announced.

 

A typical 2.5kW well sited solar pv installation could offer a homeowner a reward of up to £900 and save them £140 a year on their electricity bill.

 

Ofgem will administer the feed-in tariff scheme and suppliers will be responsible to paying the reward to their customers. The electricity supplier pays the Feed-in Tariffs (and bills users for the electricity imported in the normal way). Suppliers may choose to 'net these amounts off' and just pay a cheque or submit a bill for the difference. Claimants can appoint an agent to collect the tariffs on their behalf.

 

Meters will be needed to measure each of the three energy flows (generation, import and export). You will already have an import meter, and the others may be similar - though the whole country is changing over to Smart Meters in the next few years, and they will be able to cope with all this.

 

The UK currently gets around 5.5% of electricity from renewable sources and that will need to increase to around 30% to meet the 15% 2020 target for all energy.

 

Modeling show that small scale renewable installations could meet 2% of electricity demand in 2020. The UK currently gets less than 1% of heat from renewable sources. This this will need to rise to around 12% in order to meet the 15% 2020 target for all energy.

 

There are a couple of good web sites you can check out if you wish for further information. These are:

 

- www.fitariffs.co.uk

- www.ownergy.co.uk

 

Investors in Photovoltaics will be largely insulated from price rises that Ofgem warn could see household bills reach £2,000 pa by 2020. A typical 2.5kW well sited Photovoltaic installation could reward a homeowner with up to £900 per year and save them £140 a year off their electricity bill. Householders making this investment will get a further payment for any electricity they feed into the grid. Could you say that about a new car or fitted kitchen? Don't be deterred by the idea that the UK doesn't get enough sunshine - the sun here is more reliable than you think and only around one-third less powerful than that in southern Spain. The technology can work on south-east or south-west facing roofs too. Most of the electricity generated is consumed by the householder so virtually no energy is lost in transmission. More distant power stations can lose over a third of their energy generated in such a way.

 

For an example of all this working trip over to our post-carbon homes section and see the 3kWp system installed there. We will hopefully be getting our first FiT payments in 2010.

ROC's - Bad and irrelevant but still confusing the hell out of everyone

Carbon Output from IndustryROC's for microgeneration have now been dropped in favour of the Feed-in Tariff mechanism. "ROC" stood for "Renewable Obligation Certificates" which was part of the UK Government's participation within the European Carbon Emissions trading scheme. This is a market where you can buy and sell the right to emit carbon. If you generate electricity from a source that is carbon-free, ie, photovoltaics, then you could apply for your "ROC" on an annual basis. You would then have been paid for your "carbon hole". Someone will give you money!

 

Good idea? Well, no, not really. We are glad the FiT replaced it. Although ROCs could be a useful additional source of income they were insanely difficult to apply for. In the UK it was better for the householder to apply through their Electricity Supplier, ie, NPower, to have them act as an Agent on your behalf when dealing with Ofgem. However, putting this to one side, you soon realised that this was just becoming the worst kind of offsetting scheme. Someone is paying for the right to pollute the atmosphere just because YOU DIDN'T....

 

So if, at the end of a good year of post-carbon living you calculate your personal Carbon Tax is 2 tonnes (that is very good) you can choose to invest in a Carbon Sequestration scheme that will eventually absorb the 2 tonnes you still emitted. However, if you got down to 2 tonnes by using Photovoltaics yet earned money through ROC's then you were cheating. The money you earnt is from someone paying you not to pollute so they can. In effect you are being paid to take away their pollution. So, if you really want to get rid of their carbon you will have to pay for the sequestration of that too - hence wiping out the economic gain of Solar Electric. It is dirty money.

 

The best thing to do was to not sell your carbon 'hole'. Restricting supply would make the price rise to penalise the polluter. Indeed, certain forms of Offset Scheme do just that, they buy rights to emit Carbon from the open market and "retire" them. (This is how "Equiclimate" operates.) This puts that carbon out of reach so no one can every emit it again. However, the principle criticism of the European Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme is that the initial right to pollute were given away to Industry for free. Once they started trading they earnt a massive windfall profit because they simply didn't need all those rights. Smell a rat? Free money for big business anyone? The suggestion of corruption and incompetence has tainted an otherwise good idea. To make it work we needed to drastically retire the credits available. Reduce supply until the price shoots through the roof and starts to reflect the true cost of replacing oil in the economy.

 

***UPDATE JULY 15TH 2010*** Thankfully we need no longer worry about ROC's. FiT to the rescue.. But, hold on, what's this? ROC's briefly reared their ugly head in April through July 2010 after FiT's came in. The Department of Energy and Climate Change and Ofgem had always maintained that householders who had received the Low Carbon Building Program grant didn't need to pay it back to qualify for the FiT. Indeed the LCBP system was scrapped in February 2010 so the two schemes didn't overlap. However, buried in the small print was a clause that this only applied to grants paid on installations commissioned prior to March 31st 2010. Given that the LCBP grants for PV had a four month runtime all those people who got their grants in Dec 2009 through Feb 2010 found their April/May installations getting a grant but not FiT. How could this be when DECC and Ofgem assured everyone that this wouldn't happen? The utility companies quickly blamed DECC for misleading the public and the advice about LCBP grants only applied to those transferring from the ROC scheme. As that ended on March 31st 2010 it could not apply to new installs after that date. Practically nobody other than the utility companies noticed this screw up until June 2010. DECC hurriedly ditched their advice and everyone sat back and awaited the European Commission to deliver their judgement on State Aid. This came in late June and we were still awaiting to see how DECC interpret its opinion in the middle of July 2010.

 

What Can I do?

There are things you can do before investing in Solar Electricity than are far more cost effective in reducing your Carbon Footprint:

 

  • Insulate your home

  • Wood Burner

  • Reduce, reuse, recycle

  • Stop flying

  • Grow your own food

 

However, none of these will generate any electricity. So, when you have gone as far as you can and have a few thousand pounds burning a hole in your back pocket then please give Photovoltaics Cells a go. You will not regret it and since the FiT it is now highly profitable. Many people into micro-generation used to be just amateur hobbyists and enthusiasts who did it for the sheer pleasure of generating their own power. There was a great feeling in watching your electricity meter going backwards. You are your own power station. These days the FiT opens the field for everyone. Now that interest rates on many savings accounts have dropped to about 0.1% (July 2010) who wouldn't be interested in a return of £25,000 over 25 years for an investment of just £12,500? Your PV can earn you a 7%-10% tax-free return, index-linked.

Resource

Post-Carbon Girl

Milla Loves to GiggleWe convert sunlight into television! We convert sunshine into music. And warm food. It runs our computers. It charges our batteries for all of our favourite toys. We boil the kettle, toast bread and run the washing machine on the power of the sun. It requires no moving parts. We do nothing. It just happens. Magic!

Conclusion

Low Carbon Man
  • Hideously expensive. Require much energy to manufacture and consume finite resources.

  • No moving parts, long lifespan, practically no maintenance. Generates loads of useful electricity & now profitable!

References:
  • George Monbiot "Heat"
  • E:Mail quote from Paul McGonagle at Chiltern Future Energy
 

 

 
     
   

A Krofire Enterprise - supporting the Transition Town Movement since 2008

Krofire Enterprises Ltd